Judge for Yourself
Every week in Queensland, our courts sentence people who have broken the law. But have you ever wondered how judges and magistrates decide what sentences to give? It’s complex.
Judge for Yourself comprises three interactive court cases based on real-life events, representing the work of the Magistrates, District and Supreme Courts in Queensland.
You already know the offenders are guilty. They understand they have broken the law.
It’s your job to listen to the circumstances of the case and determine their sentence—Judge for Yourself!
- find out the type of cases each court hears
- learn about sentencing guidance judges and magistrates have to abide by
- hear about the roles of the prosecution, defence, judge and magistrate
- see the facts of the offending through the eyes of the courts, offenders and victims
- pass sentence on the offenders.
Think sentencing is easy? Hear the court case. Decide the sentence.
We offer free, interactive Judge for Yourself sessions to Queensland students and community members — providing a valuable and authentic insight into the criminal justice system and the complex task of sentencing offenders.
The sessions are designed to show Queenslanders there’s more to sentencing than is often shown in their favourite crime show or the nightly news bulletin.
Available to high schools and universities delivering civic, legal, justice and media studies programs, and community groups within a two-hour drive of Brisbane, Judge for Yourself gives participants a chance to hear the facts of a real court case and pass sentence on the offender.
Judge for Yourself provides educators with high-quality lesson content that enhances student learning about the court system.
Webinars for people outside of the south-east corner will be available soon.
A booklet, Judge for Yourself – a Guide to Sentencing in Australia, published by the Judicial Conference of Australia (JCA), is available from the JCA at $2 per booklet plus postage. For copies contact the JCA at firstname.lastname@example.org
A Tasmanian study has researched jurors to gauge public opinion about sentences and sentencing. Using jurors is a way of investigating the views of members of the public who are as fully informed of the facts of the case and the background of the offender as the judge. Based on jurors’ responses from 138 trials, the study found more than half the jurors surveyed suggested a more lenient sentence than the trial judge imposed.